ISAIAH'S INTRIGUING INTERLUDE

Many of you will be familiar with the book by J. R. Church titled, Hidden Prophecies in the Psalms. It is a fascinating study regarding the Psalms, correlating each Psalm to a year on our Gregorian calendar. Psalm 99 correlated to our 1999, Psalm 100 to the year 2000, etc. A friend recently spoke with Gary Stearman at the ministry, and he indicated that they are now exploring the concept that Isaiah may align in similar fashion to the Hebrew calendar, beginning with the timing of the new nation of Israel. Though they have not yet published anything in regard to this concept, I was very intrigued by it, and have done some searching on my own. I cannot say that my conclusions will match theirs, as I don't yet know what their conclusions would be. However, the results I found were astounding. I was hoping they would publish their findings, but they have not yet done so, and I do feel an urgency to share the results of this research right away. So, borrowing this concept, we will align the Book of Isaiah to the Hebrew calendar, from the dawn of the nation of Israel in 1948, and extend it through the beginning of the Millennial reign in the last few chapters of Isaiah. Per Mr. Stearman, and also in our reckoning of this correlation, the Hebrew year of 5709 or the Gregorian equivalent of 1948-1949 would correspond to Isaiah chapter.

We will not review each chapter, but will hit only some of the highlights of past years, and focus then on the prophetic significance of the end of the book. We'll start with chapter 14. In verses 12-19 we read:

When I first started researching this Isaiah to current end days correlation, I thought of this passage in Isaiah 14, and of our present day Luciferian personage, i.e. Maitreya. Suddenly it hit me like a ton of bricks. When Lucifer was cast out of Heaven to earth, he appeared here in the form of Maitreya - i.e. Lucifer in the flesh. I quickly calculated the timing of Isaiah 14 on this time line, and as you can see on your handout, it corresponds to 1961-1962. I then checked to see when Maitreya was born. My hands were shaking when I came to the date of his birth. Confirmation! There it was in black and white. Tears burned in my eyes as I read that he was born in February of 1962. This information can be verified on page 141 of Troy Lawrence's wonderful little book called New Age Messiah Identified. The tense seems to be important here, as in verse 12-15. Excerpts of this passage state:

You see, a previous declaration by Lucifer will yield a FUTURE disastrous consequence (which we will view momentarily), but it produces an IMMEDIATE consequence as well per our 1961-1962 time table. He IS NOW BEING (in 1961-1962 that is) cast down to earth, where he abides in a body of flesh for a time.

We have previously mentioned that there are two versions of the fig, that being the true gospel version of Yeshua, and the distorted perverted version that will be propagated by the Anti Christ. The figs are the fruit (message) and/or vessels which bear the fruit (message). Whereas Jeremiah 24:1-8 speaks of a basket of good figs and a basket of naughty figs being brought into the Temple, this would be those who bear the true gospel message of Christ, and those who have internalized the lying version thereof. In Isaiah 34:4 we read:

This is 1981-1982 on our calendar. Troy Lawrence tells us that Benjamin Creme announced at a press conference in Los Angeles on May 14, 1982 that "the Christ" is living in London. Then, per Constance Cumby's The Hidden Rainbow, we find that a few short months later, the October 1982 Reader's Digest proudly presented a full page color print of The Great Invocation, which is the New Age prayer to "Maitreya the Christ" to invoke his presence. We have referred to Share International in previous studies. We find in William Norman Grigg's excellent book called Freedom on the Altar, that Share International is a "journal produced ... IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE UN'S DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INFORMATION." The United States editor for Share International Magazine is Monte Leach. We find in Mr. Grigg's book that Mr. Leach informed the world in 1982 that Maitreya was the most exalted member of the "Spiritual Hierarchy" of the "Ascended Masters", and that at that time, i.e. in 1982, "FOR THE FIRST TIME IN THOUSANDS OF YEARS, THE MASTERS WERE RETURNING TO WORK OPENLY AMONG HUMANITY"! Ironically Reader's Digest is a Roman Catholic publication. So it may be that as a result of the publishing of this invocation by this mega "Christian" media, which summoned the Luciferian spirit, that the naughty figs complied, and fell down to Earth as figs from the fig tree, bringing their naughty fig tree gospel with them!

Chapter 45 then relates some interesting information about Cyrus. Now the current portrayal of Cyrus would not be the Cyrus of Isaiah's day, but rather a typology based on the meaning of the name or other significant feature. Cyrus means "sun", and we have talked of Lucifer being as a sun. It also appears that Lucifer is the anointed cherub of Ezekiel 28, and we remember that God surnamed him Lucifer in Isaiah 14 when he fell. With all this in mind, let's look briefly at excerpts from the first eight verses of the Isaiah 45 text.

We notice here that the two leaved (or hinged) gates (portals) are opened and will remain open for some time. As we have mentioned in previous studies, in order for the portals to be accessed, the crooked places must be made straight, and the pathway must be cleared of obstacles. This too is undertaken now. Lucifer, the anointed cherub, is given the treasures of darkness and hidden riches of secret places. That which he is given is exactly what he needs to know to fall into a trap of his own design. It is proclaimed now by God that the earth WILL (future tense) open to bring forth salvation and righteousness WILL (future tense) spring up, which probably indicates that this event will not be too far away! Please note on your time table that this correlated to our year 1992-1993. Indeed it is in 1993 that the Lampholder website indicates in their "Portal" series studies that a key transport portal opened. It is also about this time that we experienced a huge surge of crop circle formation, supposed alien visitations, and demonic activity.

Many believe that the Anti Christ system came into effect in the year 2000. Indeed this is the year that the Golden New Aquarian Age was to begin. If our Isaiah time table is correct, then chapter 52 would be 1999/2000, and 53 would be 2000/2001, putting the cusp of the new year at the transition of chapter 52 and into 53. Let's take a look at these two chapters.

Isaiah 52 opens with an urgent warning by God to HIS OWN.

Some excerpts of this chapter read:

AWAKE, AWAKE! It is 2000, and the alarm clock is going off!! God's children are told to wake up and put on THEIR STRENGTH (which is the POWER OF THE HOLY SPIRIT), and THEIR BEAUTIFUL GARMENTS (their LIGHT GARMENTS WHICH WILL SHOW FORTH THROUGH THEM WHEN THEY ARE PROPERLY YIELDED TO THE SPIRIT WITHIN!)

We are being told to allow the Holy Spirit to work through us as never before now, in order that his power can create these garments. We are told to PUT ON this strength and these garments, even as we have been instructed in Colossians 3:10 to "put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him". We must be sure to bear the mind and image of Christ from this point forward, as the scene may change drastically, quickly, and with little or no notice, and if our garments aren't ready at the right time, we will be in trouble. Please refer to our study on the White Powder of Gold for more information on this topic. His people are told to shake themselves from the dust, and loose the bands from their necks, for God says: "Ye have yourselves for nought; and ye SHALL BE (future tense) redeemed without money." You see, God is claiming His own, here, warning them to prepare themselves for His Kingdom, and to separate themselves from the unholy kingdom which is unfolding. He continues by saying ...My name continually every day is blasphemed. As evil comes to full fruition very quickly, this will be a constant occurrence. We are then told: "Depart ye, depart ye, go ye out from thence, TOUCH NO UNCLEAN THING; GO ye OUT OF THE MIDST of her; be ye clean, that bear the vessels of the Lord." It is interesting that we are likewise told in II Corinthians 6:17-18:

This is on the heels of II Corinthians 5:17 which reads:

If we have yielded ourselves to Christ via the Holy Spirit within, then we are IN CHRIST, and we have put on the NEW MAN to replace the OLD. The light of Christ will shine forth through us as a garment of light, and we will be transformed by God and received by Him. Note the wording here. TOUCH NOT THE UNCLEAN THING.

This concurs with the Nazarite vow. I am becoming more and more convinced that this commitment is meant for the First Fruits Bride of Christ. Be ye CLEAN who bear the vessels of the Lord. It is not a sin to touch an unclean thing, but God has a higher standard for those who bear the vessels of the Lord. "Bear" here means "exalt", "extol", and also "yield", and vessels are our bodies. So those who exalt and extol Christ by yielding their bodies are called on here to maintain a higher standard of cleanliness before the Lord, and if they do so, God will receive them. He addresses this next in our chapter 52 text.

For ye shall not go out with haste, nor go by flight: for the Lord will go before you; and the God of Israel will be your rearward. The term haste here indicates hasty flight, and the word flight indicates retreat, so we see that chapter 52 shows those who are being addressed here that they will not be making an immediate flight in retreat of the things to come. They will be here yet for a short while.

But who exactly IS God addressing here? We find the answer as chapter 53 opens. In verse 1 we find:

You see, those who believe "our report" are those who believe upon the one IN the report which follows, and chapter 53 tells of the redemption which Yeshua purchased for mankind. He, Yeshua, is likened here to a tender plant, which would be the true fig tree. Those who have believed the TRUE report of this GOOD fig tree are those who will be dealt with mercifully in the chapters which follow. They are those in II Thessalonians 2:10-12 who believe and love the TRUTH and are saved verses those who receive NOT the LOVE of the TRUTH and are damned.

We should also note another identifying feature of this group in Isaiah 53:1. It says:

What does this mean exactly? The word "arm" here is Strongs #2220, and also means help, mighty, power, force, as derived from #2232 which means bear, conceive, fruitful, i.e. it is those who have donned themselves with the light fruit of the spirit garment God told us to put on. You see those who "believe" the TRUE report, should be fruitful in return and exude God's power and might. It is these to whom the prior verses attest. The end of verse two is combined with verses 3-12 to relate the story of the true fig tree, i.e. the redemption of man by the blood of God's Lamb and the travail (Passion if you will) of Christ. I do believe it is worthy of our consideration now. Yeshua may have already been pulverized beyond recognition by the abuse of the royal court. Continuing with Isaiah 53, we read:

You see, the true report had to be given here, as in our day, there would be a false report, and we must be aware of the difference.

In conjunction with this report, I must take a moment or two or ten to comment on the movie The Passion of Christ, directed by Mel Gibson. I will tell you up front that I have not seen the movie, and will add that I do not plan to do so. I do not support the movie industry, and have not for many years now, so neither have I seen any other movies directed by or featuring Mel Gibson, or the other actors and actresses in this movie. Some would say that I have no right to condemn the movie without seeing it. To that I would respond that it is NOT necessary to wallow in the muck and mire with a pig in order to discern that the pig is dirty. Likewise, it is not necessary to endure the trauma induced by this movie in order to be convinced that there are problems with it! Prior to its release, and amidst all the hype by various leaders of Christendom, I started to get a sick feeling in my stomach that the hideous atrocities endured by Yeshua would be reenacted to provide entertainment for a sick society who can't get enough gore and brutality to satisfy their quickly growing thirst for violence. The thought of my Savior being the object of such a revolting scenario made me nauseous. I thought maybe I was just imagining it, but apparently this is not so. I would submit to you as evidence that my fears were well founded the following excerpts from movie reviews.

"Mr. Gibson either guilelessly or ingeniously has exploited the popular appetite for terror and gore. The movie is a sickening death trip, a grimly unilluminating procession of treachery, beatings, blood, and agony. For two hours, with only an occasional pause or gentle flashback, we watch, stupefied, as a half-naked young man is slowly tortured to death. The graphic ripping, primal violence inflicted upon flesh, whether believed to be divine flesh or only sublimely human flesh, surpasses anything this author ... has seen in a commercially released motion picture to date. Gibson focuses on the sadism and torture .... Show the brutality, but to dwell on each blow of the hammer pounding in of the nails, -- there is a point where it can become pornographic. Mel Gibson's interest clearly slants toward the graphic display of violence, this tradition of making suffering sublime and erotic. I remember him giving an interview about the movie saying that he wanted to see things he'd never seen in movie before, such as horses being impaled by spikes. It is so obsessively and so graphically bloody minded. In the first few minutes, a man called Jesus, claiming to be the son of God, gets arrested for blasphemy; For the next two hours straight, the same man gets beaten and beaten and beaten again ... . In the last 60 seconds, the man is glimpsed beside his empty tomb, restored to pristine health save for a stigmatic hole through his right palm. I wouldn't say that this movie is motivated by anti-Semitism. It's motivated by psychotic sadism. In a word, it is pornography.... The center-piece of the movie is an absolutely disgusting and despicable piece of sadism. It shows a man being flayed alive - slowly, methodically and with increasing savagery. We first of all witness the use of sticks, then whips, then multiple whips with barbed glass or metal. We see flesh being torn out of a man's body. We see pieces of human skin flying through the air. It goes on for ever. And then we see his mother wiping up masses and masses of blood. It is an absolutely unforgivable, vile, disgusting scene. It is designed to prompt the crudest human pity and emotional blackmail - which it obviously does. But then it seems to me designed to evoke a sick kind of fascination. ... About half the movie is simple wordless sadism on a level and with relentlessness that I have never witnessed in a movie before. Toward the end, unsatisfied with showing a man flayed alive, nailed gruesomely to a cross, one eye shut from being smashed in, blood covering his entire body, Gibson has a large crow perch on the neighboring cross and peck another man's eyes out. Why? Because the porn needed yet another money shot. Three main female characters in the movie were well known porn stars. Monica Bellucci, who plays Mary Magdalene in Gibson's The Passion movie, is quite the rage as a European porn queen as well as one of the hottest actress in Hollywood. Rosita Celentano, who is the androgynous character of Satan in The Passion, and Claudia Gerini, who plays the role of Pilate's wife, are hard-core porn stars as well. A simple search on the internet for any one of these Italian actresses brings up numerous pornographic websites featuring photos of them posing in varying degrees of nudity, partial to full. Ms. Belluci is no ordinary porn star, but performs in hard-core films such as Irreversible, which proved so shocking that 250 people walked out, some needing medical attention."

I will pause here for a moment to say that I did want to verify that this particular critic was on track with these comments, so I pulled up an internet review of the movie Irreversible. It states: "Extremely graphic violence rape, full frontal nudity. Alex (the stunningly beautiful Monica Bellucci) is attacked in an underground passage, anally raped and stomped by Le Tenia. The scene lasts nine minutes - without a single edit and with the suddenly rock-steady camera leering over every detail. It feels at least twice as long. The balance of Irreversible shows Marcus, Pierre, and Alex and a party, and ultimately Marcus and Alex frolicking in the full-frontal altogether, blissfully unaware of what will happen. This is a movie with ... frank exploitation, a low-end pornography that will titillate sickos who get off on seeing women and gays degraded and snuffed ...."

With that, I ended my search, having no further reason to doubt this critic's evaluation of The Passion's cast. After all, if one was going to produce a pornographic movie, would one not use pornographic stars in its production?

Going back to the reviews of The Passion, however, the most troublesome by far substantiated the worst of my fears. They state: "I wondered why the h*** they were beating up the hippie .... See, there's no context to Passion: just straight-up flesh-ripping violence porn. If you want to see a naked guy get whipped, flogged and nailed, and you live in a community with limited access to gay leather magazines, then this is really the movie for you. Satan has gotta be everyone's favorite literary character. He rocks.... Though, to be fair, Satan is played by a chick. But she's all made up to look like a dude, so I think she's supposed to be a dude. When the Romans start whipping Yoshua with flesh-gouging metal-tipped whips, you really see the flesh fly and the gouges appear. It's incredibly disgusting ... . But if you go for that sort of thing, well, this is your one chance to see it while pretending that you're engaging in piety. On the other hand, it's gonna have to be pretend piety, because this is the most a-religious Christ movie ever. There's one line snipped from the Sermon on the Mount, two sentences from the last supper, and that's about it for the preaching of Jesus. There's no character development, no background and almost nothing from JC's words. Just lots and lots of beatings. Unless you already know who Jesus is, and have already decided to root for him, there's not gonna be much drama in this film, because the movie itself provides little reason to sympathize with the main character, other than the fact that he's getting his a** kicked. This was advertised as a piece of Christian cinema which it ain't."

The consistent underlying message in these reports, would be that there is no context or explanation given for the Jesus character's arrest and brutally graphic torture other than his claim to be the son of God. Remember when I said that the only way to discern the false gospel from the true was that in the true gospel message, we would find atonement via the blood of Christ? You see, from all indications, the true purpose for Yeshua's death, and the decided victory which it won were virtually omitted. The reason for the bloodletting is left in question. As one review stated: "Moreover, the suffering is rendered almost hollow by a dramatic void. Gibson has provided no context so we can understand better who Jesus is just a series of cartoon flashbacks. We cannot empathize with Mary fully or with Peter or John - because they too are mere props for the violence." Yeshua's suffering was profound, but it was voluntary and the culmination of a life and a teaching that Gibson essentially omits. He also omits what it accomplished for you and for me.

I did see some clips of the film in a televised program called Making the Passion of Christ featured by TBN. The clips I saw were very troubling. Satan was taunting Jesus during his prayers, saying: "No one man can carry this burden I tell you. It is far too heavy. Saving their souls is too costly. No one. Ever. No. Never." The Jesus character didn't counter this at all, but responded instead with: "Father, you can do all things. If it is possible let this chalice pass from me. But let your will be done, not mine. Hear me, Father, RISE UP DEFEND ME." Satan taunts: "Do you really believe that one man can bear the full burden of sin?" Again, the Jesus character does not counter this question. He simply says: "Shelter me, O Lord. I TRUST IN YOU. IN YOU I TAKE REFUGE."

The only portion of this script that has any Biblical merit is the Jesus character praying to the Father regarding the removal of the cup, but even then no dialog with Satan is recorded in Biblical text. It was "added" to the Biblical text by the Hollywood script. It is amazing that the movie utilizes so few lines of context, and then we find that what IS used is contrived and added to what the Biblical context actually states. You see, via the lines which they cleverly add to the scripting, two subliminal thoughts are being planted: 1) One man being able to save the souls of others is impossible. 2) The Jesus character was seized and killed against his will, and the Father was unable or unwilling to help, so the Father cannot be trusted. The idea that the true Yeshua said: "Father, Rise up defend me" is preposterous. The Bible makes it clear that His sacrifice was entirely voluntary. Then the Jesus character says: "Shelter me, O Lord. I trust in you. In You I take refuge." Neither are these comments Biblical, and indicate that He expects God to prevent that which is otherwise to come. This indicates that it is stupid to put our trust in the Father, because the Jesus character trusted in Him, and He obviously didn't intervene to prevent the events to come.

Another scene puts additional words in the mouth of the portrayer of Yeshua. Pilot asks: "Are you a king?" The Jesus character answers: "My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, do you think my followers would have let them hand me over?" Pilot then says: "Then you are a king?". The Jesus character responds by stating: "That is why I was born. TO GIVE TESTIMONY TO THE TRUTH." Now where on earth do we find that in the Bible, and HOW does it answer the question of whether He is a king? What it DOES do is plant another subliminal thought, that we can count on this movie to provide TESTIMONY TO THE TRUE GOSPEL MESSAGE. What gospel message have we heard so far? 1) No one man can atone for the sins of mankind and 2) the Father can't be trusted. Now that this foundation has been established, the next two hours is spent accomplishing the degradation and desecration of the man portraying our Savior via graphic pungent violence that only serves to fuel the sick erotic perversions of sadistic desire in those who hate Yeshua AND all who are counted among his ranks. At the very end of this gore, we find the Jesus character in restored health. No report was given of the angel saying: "for he is risen from the dead" as in Matthew 28:7. He is merely seen alive, leaving the viewer to wonder exactly what transpired between the cross and the open tomb.

Also in the movie, the Jesus character suffers a blow to his right eye, and spends a majority of the movie with his right eye closed as though it is crushed in. Now, there is no Biblical mention whatsoever of Yeshua's right eye being injured. The Bible DOES, however, mention that the RIGHT eye of the Idol Shepherd (the Anti Christ version of Yeshua) is utterly darkened. It is found in Zechariah 11:17. Thus, when the IDOL SHEPHERD is somehow struck and his right eye is darkened, it will provoke the very image of the Jesus character in the film, prompting hordes of people to fall down to worship him. Indeed, Jim Caviezel, who played the Jesus character, has now stated that people recognize him after they have seen the movie, and fall down on their knees before him. You see, the false worship has already begun, and it is not yet even the designated cast of characters.

Accordingly,the timing of its release was most likely intricately calculated so that it would be fresh in the minds eye and memory of the viewer when the IDOL shepherd IS introduced to the people, so Sananda's introduction MUST BE at the threshold. Along these same lines, we have NBC airing a production called Princess Diana, the Secret Tapes, promoting emphasis on her, and putting her face in our mind's eye as well. We can only wonder what is in store there! But, back to the "report". The true report is registered in Isaiah 53. He was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed. God shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities. He bare the sin of many and made intercession for the transgressors.

Then there is the false report - the naughty fig version thereof. The stories vary, but the general trend is along these lines. We are told that Yeshua's full name is Esu Immanuel/Sananda Kumara, and he has returned to take charge of Earth's transition into the fifth dimension. We are told that when Sananda was here some 2000 years ago, his name was Esu Immanuel, and his arch-enemy Paul changed it first to Jesu then to Jesus. Esu was said to have a physical father, i.e. Joseph, and a physical mother, Mary. However, his etheric and true biological father was Arch-angel Gabriel. When he reached the age of thirty, Esu had mastered the martial arts, and because of his martial arts training Esu was able to maintain himself in a comatose state during the crucifixion. The soldiers thought Esu had died quickly, and allowed Esu to be removed from his cross and placed in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea. The tomb was closed, sealed and guarded by Roman soldiers. In two days he was healed. He later married (presumably Mary Magdalene) and bore children.

You see, the movie, as it was presented actually does not preclude such a scenario. The fact that no mention is made of his being raised from the dead per Matthew 28:6 leaves the question begging to be asked. Did he really die? He is standing there alive and healed, but nothing is said about what had transpired. It leaves the door wide open for Sananda to step through with his lying gospel message and take up where the movie ended. Indeed the movie has told us that his purpose in coming is to give TESTIMONY TO THE TRUTH. His testimony will be just what the subliminal in the movie told us. He will teach that no man is able to atone for sins, and there is really no such thing as sin. It will be implied that Adonai, whom we call the Father can't be trusted, and since we allowed him and his angels to be in charge, the world has become a disaster. Sananda will say that he brought about his own healing and the healing of others by the powers of the Luciferian light, and offer to bring mankind into this power and Christ consciousness. You see, the charade has already begun. There are already healings associated with the movie. Healings of a woman's hearing and a man's sight occurred during this production, and Jim Caviezel was struck by lightning. He saw pink for a while, yet he was not harmed. When Maitreya and Sananda are announced, there will be healings on a worldwide basis, and deception will be rampant. Matthew 24:23-27 Galatians 1:6-11, and Revelation 13:13-15 warn us of this coming false Jesus and his supernatural abilities. Already, the TBN associate who was promoting The Passion said: "I believe that there will be those who will go to see this movie who have cancer when they go, and they will be healed when they leave." Indeed this may occur, as I believe that there will be a supernatural spirit of the wrong calliber associated with a production of this nature.